Jumping in the Timeriver

Here you will find flashes of someone's mind. Hope you'll enjoy your gaze into the wonderful human psyche.
Time is essential for the human mind and for anyone's flow of ideas. Consequently you'll find in the mesmerizing grid and flow of time the sparkles and the flashes of what makes us human and thus unique.
ucresearch:


Zombie Worms Mate Inside of Whale Bones
by Carrie Arnold
When it comes to the creepy factor, Osedax worms—nicknamed “zombie worms”—beat out even the goriest movies.
A recent study reveals that these faceless, mouthless worms enjoy making sweet, sweet love inside decomposing whale skeletons that have fallen to the bottom of the ocean floor.
Originally discovered off the coast of California in 2002, Osedax—whose name is derived from the Latin for “bone eating”—got its name for its peculiar living quarters: the bones of a decomposing gray whale. These deep-dwelling worms secrete acid to bore through the hard outer bones of whales and other large vertebrate skeletons to reach the nutritious oils within.
The weirdness doesn’t stop there. Unlike many species of animals, female Osedax worms are much larger than the males—so much larger, in fact, that 50 to 100 males can live inside the female in one of nature’s most bizarre harems…
(read more: National Geo)
(photo: Norio Miyamoto/Naturwissenschaften)

Bone-melting acid — crazy!  Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UCSD recently published a study on these strange little guys.
“The Osedax symbiosis shows that nutrition is even more diverse than we imagined and our results are one step closer in untangling the special relationship between the worm and its bacteria,” said Katz, a Scripps postdoctoral researcher.
Read more →

ucresearch:

Zombie Worms Mate Inside of Whale Bones

by Carrie Arnold

When it comes to the creepy factor, Osedax worms—nicknamed “zombie worms”—beat out even the goriest movies.

A recent study reveals that these faceless, mouthless worms enjoy making sweet, sweet love inside decomposing whale skeletons that have fallen to the bottom of the ocean floor.

Originally discovered off the coast of California in 2002, Osedax—whose name is derived from the Latin for “bone eating”—got its name for its peculiar living quarters: the bones of a decomposing gray whale. These deep-dwelling worms secrete acid to bore through the hard outer bones of whales and other large vertebrate skeletons to reach the nutritious oils within.

The weirdness doesn’t stop there. Unlike many species of animals, female Osedax worms are much larger than the males—so much larger, in fact, that 50 to 100 males can live inside the female in one of nature’s most bizarre harems…

(read more: National Geo)

(photo: Norio Miyamoto/Naturwissenschaften)

Bone-melting acid — crazy!  Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UCSD recently published a study on these strange little guys.

“The Osedax symbiosis shows that nutrition is even more diverse than we imagined and our results are one step closer in untangling the special relationship between the worm and its bacteria,” said Katz, a Scripps postdoctoral researcher.

Read more →

(Source: rhamphotheca)

jtotheizzoe:

sci-fact:


“ I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers, and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and then many things I don’t know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we’re here, and what the question might mean. I might think about it a little, but if I can’t figure it out, then I go on to something else. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. ”                              ~ Richard Feynman; (Born 95 years ago today, May 11, 1918)


It’s okay  … not to know the answer? I like that too.

jtotheizzoe:

sci-fact:

“ I can live with doubt, and uncertainty, and not knowing. I think it’s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers which might be wrong. I have approximate answers, and possible beliefs, and different degrees of certainty about different things, but I’m not absolutely sure of anything, and then many things I don’t know anything about, such as whether it means anything to ask why we’re here, and what the question might mean. I might think about it a little, but if I can’t figure it out, then I go on to something else. But I don’t have to know an answer. I don’t feel frightened by not knowing things, by being lost in a mysterious universe without having any purpose, which is the way it really is, as far as I can tell, possibly. It doesn’t frighten me. ”
                              ~ Richard Feynman; (Born 95 years ago today, May 11, 1918)

It’s okay  … not to know the answer? I like that too.

justthedesign:

The Hiroaki Ohtani Layer House In Kobe. (PS: Just The Design On Twitter.)

justthedesign:

The Hiroaki Ohtani Layer House In Kobe. (PS: Just The Design On Twitter.)

ucresearch:

ucsdhealthsciences:

Absorbing news
Nanoengineers at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering have invented incredibly tiny sponges capable of soaking up a broad class of dangerous toxins in the bloodstream. So-called “pore-forming toxins” punch holes in cell membranes, killing them, and are produced by lethal microbes like MRSA and E. coli and in the venoms of snakes and bees.
Unlike other anti-toxin platforms that require customization to individual toxin types, the scientists say the new nanosponges (approximately 85 nanometers in diameter or roughly 3,000 times smaller than a red blood cell) absorb multiple toxins regardless of molecular shape. In a study using alpha-haemolysin toxin from MRSA, pre-innoculation with nanosponges enabled 89 percent of tested mice to survive lethal doses. Administering nanosponges after the lethal dose led to 44 percent survival.
The research, led by Liangfang Zhang, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Nanoengineering and researcher at the UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, was published in Nature Nanotechnology.
Read the full news release here.

A pretty amazing (and completely new!) way of removing toxins from the blood stream: Nanosponges, which are 3000 times smaller than red blood cells, flood the blood stream and intercept the toxins. The nanosponge can absorb tens to hundreds of toxins before it is eventually metabolized by the liver (with no ill effects).

ucresearch:

ucsdhealthsciences:

Absorbing news

Nanoengineers at UC San Diego’s Jacobs School of Engineering have invented incredibly tiny sponges capable of soaking up a broad class of dangerous toxins in the bloodstream. So-called “pore-forming toxins” punch holes in cell membranes, killing them, and are produced by lethal microbes like MRSA and E. coli and in the venoms of snakes and bees.

Unlike other anti-toxin platforms that require customization to individual toxin types, the scientists say the new nanosponges (approximately 85 nanometers in diameter or roughly 3,000 times smaller than a red blood cell) absorb multiple toxins regardless of molecular shape. In a study using alpha-haemolysin toxin from MRSA, pre-innoculation with nanosponges enabled 89 percent of tested mice to survive lethal doses. Administering nanosponges after the lethal dose led to 44 percent survival.

The research, led by Liangfang Zhang, PhD, an associate professor in the Department of Nanoengineering and researcher at the UC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, was published in Nature Nanotechnology.

Read the full news release here.

A pretty amazing (and completely new!) way of removing toxins from the blood stream: Nanosponges, which are 3000 times smaller than red blood cells, flood the blood stream and intercept the toxins. The nanosponge can absorb tens to hundreds of toxins before it is eventually metabolized by the liver (with no ill effects).

ucsdhealthsciences:

Big picture biology, version 3
Even as scientists probe ever more deeply into the fundamental constituents of life, it has become increasingly important to also step back and ponder how these parts comprise the whole. As this Technology Review story presciently noted in 2003, some of biology’s bigger secrets may only be revealed in the bigger picture.
One of the tools that has made it possible to intelligently and coherently grapple with massive amounts of biological data being produced is a free, open source software platform called Cytoscape, which enables researchers to visualize enormously complex networks of interacting molecules, their biological pathways and annotate them with revelatory data like gene expression profiles.
The first version of Cytoscape debuted in the early 2000s. In the years since, roughly 1,600 scientific papers citing the software have been published. Each year an estimated 300-400 new ones appear.
Cytoscape is the product of Trey Ideker, PhD, a professor in the departments of Medicine and Bioengineering at UC San Diego, colleagues at the Cytoscape Project, and elsewhere.
They’ve just released Cytoscape v3, which you can read more about here. Though originally intended for biological research, Cytoscape is increasingly used by scientists doing complex network analyses, including those of social networks.

ucsdhealthsciences:

Big picture biology, version 3

Even as scientists probe ever more deeply into the fundamental constituents of life, it has become increasingly important to also step back and ponder how these parts comprise the whole. As this Technology Review story presciently noted in 2003, some of biology’s bigger secrets may only be revealed in the bigger picture.

One of the tools that has made it possible to intelligently and coherently grapple with massive amounts of biological data being produced is a free, open source software platform called Cytoscape, which enables researchers to visualize enormously complex networks of interacting molecules, their biological pathways and annotate them with revelatory data like gene expression profiles.

The first version of Cytoscape debuted in the early 2000s. In the years since, roughly 1,600 scientific papers citing the software have been published. Each year an estimated 300-400 new ones appear.

Cytoscape is the product of Trey Ideker, PhD, a professor in the departments of Medicine and Bioengineering at UC San Diego, colleagues at the Cytoscape Project, and elsewhere.

They’ve just released Cytoscape v3, which you can read more about here. Though originally intended for biological research, Cytoscape is increasingly used by scientists doing complex network analyses, including those of social networks.

bpod-mrc:

30 April 2013 Click Here for Video
Clearing Your Mind
Understanding how the brain works to produce behaviour is one of biology’s greatest challenges, and the sheer complexity and number of cells in vertebrate brains makes it difficult to get a close look. While most studies rely on painstakingly reconstructing 3D images from thin sections, a new technique allowing much thicker samples, even whole brains, to be observed in detail has recently been developed. Named CLARITY, the method uses a detergent to dissolve the cells’ fatty membranes, effectively making brain tissue transparent under the microscope. Researchers can then see deep inside the brain, identify particular cell types and track their connections. In the video, CLARITY has been used to image a mouse hippocampus, and different cell types have been labelled with fluorescent proteins. The technique has also been applied to human samples, opening up new possibilities for exploring both neural networks in healthy brains and the causes of neuronal diseases.
Written by Emmanuelle Briolat
—

Karl Deisseroth
Stanford University, USA
Reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Copyright 2013
Published in Nature

bpod-mrc:

30 April 2013 Click Here for Video

Clearing Your Mind

Understanding how the brain works to produce behaviour is one of biology’s greatest challenges, and the sheer complexity and number of cells in vertebrate brains makes it difficult to get a close look. While most studies rely on painstakingly reconstructing 3D images from thin sections, a new technique allowing much thicker samples, even whole brains, to be observed in detail has recently been developed. Named CLARITY, the method uses a detergent to dissolve the cells’ fatty membranes, effectively making brain tissue transparent under the microscope. Researchers can then see deep inside the brain, identify particular cell types and track their connections. In the video, CLARITY has been used to image a mouse hippocampus, and different cell types have been labelled with fluorescent proteins. The technique has also been applied to human samples, opening up new possibilities for exploring both neural networks in healthy brains and the causes of neuronal diseases.

Written by Emmanuelle Briolat

awkwardsituationist:

high tide and low tide in great britain. photographs by michael marten

(via abcstarstuff)

distant-traveller:

Prometheus creating Saturn ring streamers

What’s causing those strange dark streaks in the rings of Saturn? Prometheus. Specifically, an orbital dance involving Saturn’s moon Prometheus keeps creating unusual light and dark streamers in the F-Ring of Saturn. Now Prometheus orbits Saturn just inside the thin F-ring, but ventures into its inner edge about every 15 hours. Prometheus’ gravity then pulls the closest ring particles toward the 100-km moon. The result is not only a stream of bright ring particles but also a dark ribbon where ring particles used to be. Since Prometheus orbits faster than the ring particles, the icy moon pulls out a new streamer every pass. Sometimes, several streamers or kinks are visible at once.

Image credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA

distant-traveller:

Prometheus creating Saturn ring streamers

What’s causing those strange dark streaks in the rings of Saturn? Prometheus. Specifically, an orbital dance involving Saturn’s moon Prometheus keeps creating unusual light and dark streamers in the F-Ring of Saturn. Now Prometheus orbits Saturn just inside the thin F-ring, but ventures into its inner edge about every 15 hours. Prometheus’ gravity then pulls the closest ring particles toward the 100-km moon. The result is not only a stream of bright ring particles but also a dark ribbon where ring particles used to be. Since Prometheus orbits faster than the ring particles, the icy moon pulls out a new streamer every pass. Sometimes, several streamers or kinks are visible at once.

Image credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA

(via nevertheh3ro)

ucsdhealthsciences:

Neonatal Lung Disease: a Q & A with our chief of neonatology
Nothing announces the arrival of a new child more loudly than his or her first squeal of outrage, the product of an unexpected slap on the bottom and a healthy pair of brand new lungs.
It’s a sound rarely heard from babies born prematurely, who often enter the world with lungs neither fully formed nor functional. Indeed, premature newborns are at greater risk of suffering neonatal lung disease, a collection of ailments ranging from pulmonary hypoplasia (incomplete lung development) to infant respiratory distress syndrome, a condition caused by insufficient production of lung surface proteins vital to lung function.
Treating neonatal lung disease is among medicine’s toughest challenges. Premature babies or “pre-terms” typically weigh just a few pounds. Their grip on life may be tentative and precarious. Therapies to help them breathe – and survive – can cause permanent damage.
We asked Lawrence S. Prince, MD, PhD, chief of neonatology at UC San Diego Health System and at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, to talk about the causes of neonatal lung disease and research efforts to help pre-terms grow their own lungs.
Q: Are neonatal lung diseases primarily the consequence of underdevelopment and premature birth or do other factors, such as genetics, play a significant role?
A: Neonatal lung disease is clearly the result of being born premature or pre-term. In some pre-term infants, the lungs fail to develop, while other body parts grow normally. Most likely, this arrested lung development results from the unanticipated early exposure of the lung to air and bacteria in the outside world. Activation of the lung immune system then somehow destroys the normal blueprint for forming a mature lung. However, not all infants develop persistent lung disease, suggesting there may be a genetic component that we do not yet understand. Lung disease in pre-term infants is therefore a classic mix of “nature v. nurture,” with both genetic risk and environmental exposures determining which patients get the disease.
Q: Are there fundamental differences in how the lungs of a premature newborn develop compared to a baby who is full-term?
A: The tiny spaces in the lung that actually allow oxygen to get into our bloodstream and carbon dioxide to leave our body are called alveoli. These structures don’t form until the last month or two of pregnancy. Infants who are born pre-term do not yet have any alveoli, and subsequent lung development occurs much more slowly than babies who remain inside their mother. Because of their immature lung structures, pre-term infants sometime need extra oxygen or a mechanical ventilator to breathe even when they reach the size and maturity of a full-term infant. In the most critically ill pre-term infants, lung development stops completely and alveoli never form.
Q: What are the specific risks and challenges in promoting and maintaining the respiratory health of newborns with neonatal lung diseases?
A: The biggest challenge in neonatal lung disease is balancing the amount of intensive care we provide with minimizing the amount of potential injury done to vulnerable, immature lungs. Pre-term infants often need mechanical ventilation and extra oxygen to survive, but we know that this support can produce long-term damage and increase the chance of lung infection or pneumonia. We therefore closely monitor exactly what each pre-term infant receives every minute of the day and night, quickly adjusting our treatment to remove ventilators and reduce oxygen exposure as soon as possible. This takes many specially trained personnel working around the clock for each patient. Our next biggest concern is how to prevent infection. If pre-term infants get bacterial or viral pneumonia, even after they go home, they are more likely to end up with long-term lung disease.
Q: Much of your research involves lung regeneration and growth, what kind of reparative power do lungs have?
A: We don’t know why the lungs of some pre-term infants continue to grow and develop normally but others do not. My laboratory has been approaching this problem from several directions. We spend a lot of time trying to figure out which cells and molecules in the lung are damaged by oxygen and infection. In addition, we are using various growth factor and stem cell approaches to see what can make the damaged lung grow normally. Our hope is to both prevent oxygen and infection from causing long term lung damage and to stimulate normal lung growth and development in those pre-term infants that have suffered lung injury.

ucsdhealthsciences:

Neonatal Lung Disease: a Q & A with our chief of neonatology

Nothing announces the arrival of a new child more loudly than his or her first squeal of outrage, the product of an unexpected slap on the bottom and a healthy pair of brand new lungs.

It’s a sound rarely heard from babies born prematurely, who often enter the world with lungs neither fully formed nor functional. Indeed, premature newborns are at greater risk of suffering neonatal lung disease, a collection of ailments ranging from pulmonary hypoplasia (incomplete lung development) to infant respiratory distress syndrome, a condition caused by insufficient production of lung surface proteins vital to lung function.

Treating neonatal lung disease is among medicine’s toughest challenges. Premature babies or “pre-terms” typically weigh just a few pounds. Their grip on life may be tentative and precarious. Therapies to help them breathe – and survive – can cause permanent damage.

We asked Lawrence S. Prince, MD, PhD, chief of neonatology at UC San Diego Health System and at Rady Children’s Hospital-San Diego, to talk about the causes of neonatal lung disease and research efforts to help pre-terms grow their own lungs.

Q: Are neonatal lung diseases primarily the consequence of underdevelopment and premature birth or do other factors, such as genetics, play a significant role?

A: Neonatal lung disease is clearly the result of being born premature or pre-term. In some pre-term infants, the lungs fail to develop, while other body parts grow normally. Most likely, this arrested lung development results from the unanticipated early exposure of the lung to air and bacteria in the outside world. Activation of the lung immune system then somehow destroys the normal blueprint for forming a mature lung. However, not all infants develop persistent lung disease, suggesting there may be a genetic component that we do not yet understand. Lung disease in pre-term infants is therefore a classic mix of “nature v. nurture,” with both genetic risk and environmental exposures determining which patients get the disease.

Q: Are there fundamental differences in how the lungs of a premature newborn develop compared to a baby who is full-term?

A: The tiny spaces in the lung that actually allow oxygen to get into our bloodstream and carbon dioxide to leave our body are called alveoli. These structures don’t form until the last month or two of pregnancy. Infants who are born pre-term do not yet have any alveoli, and subsequent lung development occurs much more slowly than babies who remain inside their mother. Because of their immature lung structures, pre-term infants sometime need extra oxygen or a mechanical ventilator to breathe even when they reach the size and maturity of a full-term infant. In the most critically ill pre-term infants, lung development stops completely and alveoli never form.

Q: What are the specific risks and challenges in promoting and maintaining the respiratory health of newborns with neonatal lung diseases?

A: The biggest challenge in neonatal lung disease is balancing the amount of intensive care we provide with minimizing the amount of potential injury done to vulnerable, immature lungs. Pre-term infants often need mechanical ventilation and extra oxygen to survive, but we know that this support can produce long-term damage and increase the chance of lung infection or pneumonia. We therefore closely monitor exactly what each pre-term infant receives every minute of the day and night, quickly adjusting our treatment to remove ventilators and reduce oxygen exposure as soon as possible. This takes many specially trained personnel working around the clock for each patient. Our next biggest concern is how to prevent infection. If pre-term infants get bacterial or viral pneumonia, even after they go home, they are more likely to end up with long-term lung disease.

Q: Much of your research involves lung regeneration and growth, what kind of reparative power do lungs have?

A: We don’t know why the lungs of some pre-term infants continue to grow and develop normally but others do not. My laboratory has been approaching this problem from several directions. We spend a lot of time trying to figure out which cells and molecules in the lung are damaged by oxygen and infection. In addition, we are using various growth factor and stem cell approaches to see what can make the damaged lung grow normally. Our hope is to both prevent oxygen and infection from causing long term lung damage and to stimulate normal lung growth and development in those pre-term infants that have suffered lung injury.

(Source: aberrantbeauty, via libre-sollus)

razorshapes:

Ran Ortner - Oil on Canvas

(via serialthrill)